by

For years, Flock Safety’s automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras have quietly become one of the most powerful — and most controversial — tools in California law enforcement. That controversy reached a tipping point this month when the Los Angeles Police Department, the third-largest police force in the country, walked away from its contract with the company. For anyone facing a DUI, theft, or other criminal charge built on ALPR “hits,” this development matters, and it’s exactly the kind of evidentiary weak point our firm looks for when building a defense.

Why LAPD Walked Away

On July 11, 2026, LAPD allowed its three-year agreement with Flock Safety to lapse rather than renew it. LAPD’s chief information officer, Dean Gialamas, was blunt about the reason: the department had “serious concerns around civil liberties and civil rights issues, particularly around privacy and the data that is being collected from these cameras.” According to ABC7 Los Angeles, the cameras — which are typically owned not by police but by private organizations and homeowners’ associations that grant police access — will remain in place, but LAPD says it wants new contract language addressing privacy and data storage before it resumes full use (ABC7 Los Angeles).

Continue reading →

by
If you or someone you love has been accused of organized retail theft in Orange County, you’re facing more than a typical shoplifting case. California Penal Code § 490.4 targets coordinated theft rings, and recent changes under Proposition 36 have made prosecutors far more aggressive about filing these charges as felonies — sometimes even when the dollar amount involved is small. Understanding how these operations are structured, how the law defines them, and what defenses are available is the first step toward protecting your future.
What Is Organized Retail Theft Under California Law?
Organized retail theft isn’t just shoplifting with a friend. Under <cite index=”5-1″>Penal Code 490.4, a person is guilty of organized retail theft when they act in concert with one or more people to steal merchandise from a store or online marketplace with intent to sell, exchange, or return it for value</cite>. The statute also covers people who <cite index=”5-1″>act in concert with others to knowingly receive, purchase, or possess stolen merchandise</cite>, those who <cite index=”5-1″>act as an agent carrying out an organized theft plan</cite>, and anyone who <cite index=”5-1″>recruits, coordinates, organizes, supervises, directs, manages, or finances</cite> these operations.
Continue reading →

by
If you’ve driven through almost any California city in the last few years, there’s a good chance a Flock Safety camera has photographed your license plate. These automated license plate reader (ALPR) systems have quietly become one of the most widespread surveillance tools in the state, used by police departments, homeowners’ associations, and private businesses alike. But as Flock cameras multiply, so do the legal questions surrounding them — questions about privacy rights, data accuracy, and how this technology gets used (and sometimes misused) in criminal cases.
At the Law Offices of William M. Weinberg, we track how new surveillance technology affects our clients’ rights. Below, I’m going to break down what Flock cameras are, how law enforcement uses them, the legal issues they raise, and how I  defend clients in cases built on this kind of automated evidence.
What Are Flock Cameras and How Are They Used?
Continue reading →

by

The California Supreme Court’s recent decision in In re Kowalczyk is one of the most significant developments in California criminal law and pretrial release procedures in years. Building upon the Court’s earlier ruling in In re Humphrey, the new decision further limits the ability of courts to rely upon unaffordable money bail as a means of keeping defendants in custody while their cases are pending.

For anyone arrested in California, including those facing DUI charges, drug crimes, theft offenses, domestic violence allegations, or other criminal charges, the Kowalczyk decision may have a substantial impact on whether they remain in jail or are released while awaiting trial.

Understanding Bail in California

Continue reading →

by

If you were just arrested for child pornography charges in California, you are facing some of the most serious criminal charges in the state. These cases move fast, and the stakes are extremely high — including prison time, lifetime sex offender registration, and a destroyed reputation.

Here’s the short answer: California child pornography charges under Penal Code § 311 can result in 1–8 years in state prison per count, mandatory sex offender registration, and devastating personal consequences. But an experienced child porn lawyer can challenge the evidence, the investigation, and the charges themselves — and in some cases get charges reduced or dismissed.

Keep reading to understand the process, the penalties, and your legal options.

Continue reading →

by
Every year, thousands of otherwise law-abiding professionals find themselves facing embezzlement charges — people who spent years building careers, raising families, and earning the trust of employers, only to have that trust become the centerpiece of a criminal prosecution. Embezzlement is not robbery. It does not involve violence, strangers, or the sudden impulse of desperation in an alley. It involves a relationship — and that distinction matters enormously, both at trial and at sentencing.
If you or someone you care about is facing an embezzlement investigation or indictment, understanding the legal landscape, the sentencing realities, and the full human context of the offense is the first step toward building a meaningful defense.
What is Employee Embezzlement, Actually?
Continue reading →

by

Maybe you’re in this situation and you’re thinking about handling it yourself, paying a fine, and moving on. Before you do anything — read this. What looks like a small legal hiccup can quietly unravel your career, your immigration status, and your entire future.

Every day, people walk into California courtrooms alone to face theft charges they believe are trivial. Shoplifting. A disputed return. Taking something valued under $950. Some plead guilty to “get it over with.” They pay a small fine, leave the courthouse, and exhale — relieved it’s behind them. Weeks later, they lose their job. Months later, they receive a notice from immigration. Years later, they’re still checking “yes” on job applications when asked if they’ve ever been convicted of a crime involving dishonesty.

A theft conviction is not just a legal matter. It is a permanent mark that follows you into job interviews, licensing boards, landlord screenings, and federal immigration proceedings. Hiring an experienced criminal defense attorney is not an extravagance for serious crimes — it is an essential protection for any theft charge, no matter how minor it appears.

Continue reading →

by

Facing allegations involving possession of child pornography is a serious and life-altering situation. These cases are prosecuted aggressively across the United States, and even a single charge can carry long-term consequences, including incarceration, mandatory registration, and lasting reputational harm. While federal law sets a framework, most cases are handled at the state level—where penalties, procedures, and prosecutorial approaches can vary significantly.

This overview is designed to help you understand how these cases are typically handled across different states, what factors influence prosecution, and what penalties may apply.

What Does “Possession” Mean Under the Law?

Continue reading →

by

Few criminal investigations create more fear than allegations involving narcotics sales and firearms. In both California and federal court, prosecutors treat the combination of drugs and guns as a high-priority public safety issue. The consequences can include years — or even decades — in prison, asset forfeiture, probation restrictions, immigration consequences, and a permanent felony record.

One of the first questions people ask is simple: Will this be a federal case or a state case? The answer depends on several factors, including the amount of narcotics involved, the type of firearm, whether interstate activity is alleged, whether law enforcement agencies were working together, and whether prosecutors believe the case is connected to organized distribution.

The good news is that an investigation is not the same thing as a conviction. Early intervention by an experienced criminal defense attorney can materially affect the outcome of a case.

Continue reading →

by

Healthcare fraud enforcement in California—particularly involving Medicare, Medi-Cal, and hospice services—has intensified dramatically in recent years. Federal and state prosecutors are prioritizing these cases due to the enormous financial losses involved and the vulnerability of the patient populations affected. For providers, billers, and owners, the consequences of an investigation can be life-altering.

Understanding Medicare and Medi-Cal Fraud

Medicare (a federal program) and Medi-Cal (California’s Medicaid program) are both frequent targets of fraud investigations. These cases typically arise under statutes such as the federal False Claims Act, healthcare fraud statutes (18 U.S.C. § 1347), and California Penal Code provisions relating to insurance fraud.

Continue reading →
Contact Information
Irvine Office
19200 Von Karman Ave #380
Irvine, CA 92612
Phone: (949) 474-8008 Fax: (714) 559-4977 bill@williamweinberg.com

Please do not include any confidential or sensitive information in a contact form, text message, or voicemail. The contact form sends information by non-encrypted email, which is not secure. Submitting a contact form, sending a text message, making a phone call, or leaving a voicemail does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Copyright © 2014 – 2026, William Weinberg
JUSTIA Law Firm Blog Design